|2008 NESCAC Volleyball
|Hosted by Tufts University|
|Friday, Nov. 7||Saturday, Nov. 8||Sunday, Nov. 9|
|at No. 1 TUF
3, No. 8 BAT 1||No. 4 WIL 3, at No. 1 TUF 2||No. 4 WIL 3, vs. No. 3 AMH 1|
|No. 2 WES 3, No. 7 BOW 1||No. 3 AMH 3,
vs. No. 2 WES 1|
|No. 3 AMH 3, vs. No. 6 CONN 2|
|No. 4 WIL 3, No. 5 MID 1|
Williams Earns Volleyball Championship Over Amherst, 3-1
Courtesy Tufts Sports Information
MEDFORD, Mass. - The Williams College Ephs captured their second consecutive NESCAC Volleyball Championship and eighth all-time with a 3-1 (25-18, 20-25, 25-12, 25-21) victory over Amherst Sunday afternoon at Cousens Gymnasium on the campus of Tufts University. Williams earns an automatic berth into the NCAA Tournament, where they will enter with a record of 25-12.
The first set of the day was a great start to the championship match as there were 10 ties and six lead changes. Amherst took a lead at 10-9 and built it to a high of three points at 16-13. The Ephs pulled to within two at 18-16 and then Williams seized control as they recorded nine straight points to earn the first set victory, 25-18.
The Lord Jeffs held control in the second set, allowing Williams to have only one lead during the set which reached just two points at 6-4. The Ephs did use a 5-0 run to even the score up at 16 apiece, but Amherst buckled down and went on for the set victory, 25-20.
In the third set, there were seven ties to start, then Williams took over as they reeled off seven of eight points to go up 14-8. The Jeffs did not get any closer than five points. The Ephs used another run of six straight to win the third set, 25-12.
The fourth set was controlled by the Ephs as Amherst only held the lead once at 1-0. Williams pushed ahead for a set-high lead of seven points at 21-14. The Jeffs did not give in easily though, pulling to within two at 21-19 with a 5-0 run. That's as close as Amherst would get as Williams held on for the 25-21 fourth-set win to clinch the 2008 NESCAC Volleyball Championship.
Sophomore Nicole Ballon-Landa (La Jolla, Calif.) led the way for the Ephs as she racked up 17 kills and six digs. Sophomore Kate Anderson (Berlin, Mass.) also added 17 kills. The digs leader for Williams was once again junior Melissa Pun (San Francisco, Calif.) with 24, while sophomore Emily Avis (Palo Alto, CA) recorded a team-high 47 assists. Junior Andrea Scioscia (Gibsonia, PA) chipped in with three service aces.
Amherst was paced by the 11 kills and seven digs of first-year Cristy Meier (San Anselmo, Calif.). Sophomore Rachel Yorke (Los Angeles, Calif.) added a team-high 29 digs for the Jeffs. Senior Sara Heller (La Canada, Calif.) was excellent in defeat with 36 assists and 20 digs.
With the win, the Ephs are the first team to win back-to-back championships since they won four in a row from 2001 to 2004. Amherst, which last won the conference championship in 2006, fall to 22-8 for the year.
2008 NESCAC VOLLEYBALL CHAMPIONSHIP
Quarterfinals - Friday, November 7 at Tufts
at No. 1 Tufts 3, No. 8 Bates 1
No. 2 Wesleyan 3, vs. No. 7 Bowdoin 1
No. 3 Amherst 3, vs. No. 6 Connecticut College 2
No. 4 Williams 3, vs. No. 5 Middlebury 1
Championship - Sunday, November 9 at Tufts
No. 4 Williams 3, vs. No. 3 Amherst 1
2008 NESCAC VOLLEYBALL CHAMPIONSHIP
Friday, November 7 - Sunday, November
at No. 1 Seed
Friday, November 7
No. 8 at No. 1
No. 7 vs. No. 2
No. 6 vs. No. 3
No. 5 vs. No. 4
Semifinals - Saturday, November 8
Winner No.1/No. 8 vs. Winner No. 4/No. 5 - 1:00 p.m.
Winner No. 2/No. 7 vs. Winner No. 3/No. 6 - 3:30 p.m.
Championship - Sunday, November 9
Semifinal Winners - 12:00 p.m.
The top eight teams in the conference will qualify for the NESCAC Volleyball Championship beginning Friday, November 7 through Sunday, November 9. The tournament champion will receive an automatic bid to the NCAA Division III Championship.
Seeding will be based on final conference standings of round robin play. The highest seeded team will host the Championship.
Pairings will be announced Sunday, November 2.
Tie Breaking Procedures
Ties will be broken as follows:
Head-to-head result (if teams play each other more than once during the regular season, the game that appears on the league schedule will be the game that is counted).
If teams tied during the regular season, or there is a 3-way or more tie, the following tie breaking procedure will be used:
Best match record among tying teams, against one another (head-to-head).
Best game record among tying teams, against one another (head-to-head).
Point differential of matches between tied teams (points scored-points scored against).
Comparison of results of conference games played against top 4 teams (including all teams at the 4th spot).
Comparison of results of conference games played against top 8 teams (including all teams at the 8th spot).
Comparison of results of conference games played against conference teams in rank order. Comparisons shall be made one team at a time starting with the highest ranked team.
If the tie remains after comparing results against the highest ranked team, the results against the next team in rank order shall be used. This process is continued until a winner is determined.
Coin flip (or similar random action involving all tied teams).
Note: In case of ties among three or more schools, the criteria above will be applied in order until a team is (or teams are) separated. At that point, the process begins anew (returning to the first criteria) with the remaining teams. The process is continued until the tie is eventually broken. In cases where only a random action will break the tie of three or more teams, the random action will be applied to all teams involved in the tie. For example, if three teams are tied and only a random action (pulling names out of a hat) will break the tie, each name will be pulled and seeded in order of being pulled. Also, in the event that there are two (or more) groups of teams tied at different spots in the standings and the only criteria left that can be used to break those ties is a coin flip/random action, the coin flip/random action used to break the tie of one group (to put teams in rank order) will not affect the tie breaking procedures of the other group(s) of tied teams.